Public
Invited To Comment On Mining Proposal
DULUTH
NEWS TRIBUNE Thu, Aug. 04, 2005
Area
residents are invited to weigh in on Minnesota Steel Industries'
proposal to operate an open-pit taconite mine, an ore concentrator,
a pellet plant, a direct-reduced iron plant, a steel mill and
a tailings basin near Nashwauk. The applicant seeks a permit
to discharge fill materials into a wetlands area as part of
the project.
The U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources plan to host a public meeting at Nashwauk High School,
400 Second St., from 6:30 to 9 p.m. Wednesday. The gathering
is intended to help identify issues that warrant further analysis
through an Environmental Impact Statement.
People
who are unable to attend may submit written statements by mail
to: District Engineer, St. Paul District, Corps of Engineers,
190 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55101-1638, Attn: Jon Ahlness,
Regulatory Branch. Statements may be faxed to (651) 290-5330.
The DNR
has prepared an environmental assessment worksheet and a draft
scoping decision document to help guide its review process.
These are available for review at several locations, including
the DNR office at 1201 E. Highway 2, Grand Rapids, and the Division
of Lands and Minerals, 1525 Third Ave. E., Hibbing. The documents
are on file at the Duluth Public Library, 221 W. First St.
Wisconsin
Science Advisory Council of Metallic Mining Members
The advisory
council appointed by Governor Tommy Thompson to study the Forest
County zinc and copper deposit, and which was recently dissolved
on a technicality by Gov Doyle, is comprised of
the following members:
Anders
W. Andren, Chairman, Professor of Environmental Chemistry and
Technology, University of Wisconsin Madison
Tuncer
Edil, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UW
Madison
Tim Grundl,
Professor of Geology and Geophysics, UW Milwaukee
Bezalel
Haimson, Professor of Geological Engineering, UW Madison
Alphonse
Zanoni, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Marquette
University
Town of Nashville
claims mining company violated agreement:
The
Town of Nashville claims that Nicolet Minerals Co. has violated
terms of an agreement to the point that the 1996 deal can be
reopened for negotiation. The Town's letter said that the mining
company had 30 days to "cure the breach" and provide
a written response or else the town would go to court to bring
an "action for breach of the entire local agreement."
The
town's attorney indicated that the town would like to renegotiate
the agreement in significant ways. Gordon Connor, project manager,
said that the town's allegations are frivolous and a waste of
taxpayer money.
The current Town of Nashville Board is opposed to the mining
project and has attempted to have the local agreement stricken
since they took office. In 1998 the board rescinded the agreement,
but that move was subsequently overturned. In 2002, the Court
of Appeals upheld the judge and ruled that the local agreement
conformed with state law and resolved the zoning issues needed
for mine development.
The
town board's current claim is that the mining company has changed
the terms of the original project. In fact, the new owners,
in an effort to appease some of the local concerns about potential
pollution, explored having the ore shipped to out-of-state mills
for processing.
When
that concept was determined to not be feasible, and realizing
that such a change would trigger new regulatory reviews and
cause further delay in receiving the permits, the mining company
dropped all consideration. The Town of Nashville is now saying
that the consideration of a change to the original mining project
amounts to a change that entitles Nashville to reopen the local
agreement.
In
addition, the new mine owners have asked for the Department
of Natural Resources to put the review of the mining permit
application on hold while they complete an internal review.
The company's request for a stay is designed to stop the endless
review of the application until it becomes clear that the DNR
will actually issue its final recommendations. The review is
being funded totally by the mining company. The Town of Nashville
contends that this is a "de-facto withdrawal" of the
mining permit applications under the terms of the existing local
agreement.
Nicolet
Minerals Company believes that at this time the Department of
Natural Resources already has sufficient information to publish
the environmental impact statement and that there continues
to be a pattern of foot-dragging going on with the review. Connor
said that the project has essentially been on stay for the last
five years. [July 1, 2003]
Owners of Nicolet
Minerals offer to sell land to tribes:
The
owners of the proposed Forest County zinc and copper mine have
offered to sell a small piece of the property to the Mole Lake
Chippewa and Forest County Potawatomi tribes.
Spirit
Hill is the burial site of more than 500 Chippewa and Sioux
warriors who died in an 1806 battle for control of the wild
rice beds on nearby Rice Lake.
Mole
Lake representatives were recently quoted as being worried "about
all of the graves up on Spirit Hill that the mining company
wants to dig up." Gordon R Connor, project manager, said
that "We want to be sensitive to their spiritual needs
and we will give them the right of first refusal, but we are
in the active process of selling Spirit Hill, and when it's
done it's no longer our concern."
Connor
said that the property offered to the tribes will be sold at
market value because they would like to recoup their cost. Spirit
Hill takes up about 300 acres of the nearly 5000-acre mining
property.
Representatives
of the Mole Lake Chippewa and Forest County Potawatomi were
said to be unaware of the proposal by Connor and they declined
to comment. [June 30, 2003]
Proposed Mine
Purchased by Northern Wisconsin Resource Group:
Gordon
P. Connor, owner of Nicolet Hardwoods in Laona, recently announced
the purchase of the zinc-copper ore deposit located south of Crandon.
Connor said that he recognized the lack of economic opportunities
in northern Wisconsin and his interest in purchasing the deposit
was to save an outstanding asset for the community and to prevent
the sale to another party that might simply shelve the project
and eliminate more than $150 million in exploration and permitting
dollars invested to date.
Connor
said that he has watched the frustrating permitting process
which the previous owners have gone through for over 25 years
and he recognizes that many of the people who are attempting
to stop the mine development are the same people that are opposed
logging and paper mills. He said that most of those who are
opposed to the mining operation as proposed by Nicolet Minerals
Co. are simply ignoring the scientific facts. Connor noted that
those who oppose the project on strict environmental grounds
or on the assumption that there will be a negative impact on
tourism are mistaken.
Connor
stated that while tourism is important to the economy of Forest
County, tourism cannot sustain itself and expand in this part
of the state. He noted that the mine would probably become the
biggest tourist attraction in the area. Camp 10, currently the
largest single tourist attraction in rural northern Wisconsin,
is located at Laona and is operated by the Connor family.
He
also called attention to the fact that the permitting process
has been complicated by a cumbersome bureaucratic system that
requires the permit application to be based on technology in
place at the time the permitting process was initiated. Nicolet
Minerals Co. began seeking permits in 1994. [April
11, 2003]
Exit Stage Right:
The
Northern Wisconsin Resource Group (NWRG) announced that Nicolet
Minerals Company (NMC) has been sold to the Mole Lake Sokaogon
Chippewa and the Forest County Potawatomi Community for the sum
of $16.5 million.
During
the past 25 years, mining companies have spent over 150 million
dollars attempting to develop the Forest County zinc-copper
deposit. The State of Wisconsin regulatory process has been
on-going for at least 18 of those years and NWRG has been informed
that the decision on permits would be at least two and one-half
years away.
During
the most recent ten-year period, the regulatory review process
and increasingly hostile political environment made it impossible
for NMC to find a mining partner for the "Crandon"
deposit. Without exception, every major mining group contacted
declined to pursue any development of the deposit because of
Wisconsin's negative political and regulatory process. For a
state rich in mining tradition, the loss of this opportunity
compounds the already economically depressed northern part of
the state by denying residents the opportunity to have hundreds
of direct and indirect well-paying mining jobs and the loss
of one of the areas largest potential tourist attractions. [10.28.2003]